Sertifikat-removebg-preview2
AGRIBUSINESS STUDY PROGRAM

Faculty of Science and Technology

Evaluation Report of Complaint Services
Home » Evaluation Report of Complaint Services

The Agribusiness Department, in coordination with the Faculty of Science and Technology, maintains a proactive and integrated system for addressing student grievances. Upon receiving a formal complaint, the Faculty leadership and the Departmental Chairperson conduct a joint evaluation to determine the necessary corrective actions, ensuring that academic, administrative, and facility-related issues are resolved promptly. This collaborative follow-up process is documented as part of the department's commitment to quality assurance, transparency, and continuous improvement in student services, aligning with the national accreditation standards for institutional excellence.

  • Internal Quality Audit (AMI): The Undergraduate (S1) Agribusiness program achieved a high score of 90, while the Master’s (S2) Agribusiness program received a score of 65.

  • Lecturer Workload (BKD): One lecturer in the Agribusiness department was flagged for not meeting the requirements (T) in the implementation of the Tridharma (Education, Research, and Community Service).

  • Human Resources: The S1 program was supported by 13 permanent civil servant (PNS) lecturers and 4 candidate civil servant (CPNS) lecturers, while the S2 program had 5 permanent civil servant lecturers.

  • Graduate Performance: Out of 118 graduates, 56 students (47.5%) graduated on time with a minimum GPA of 3.25.

  • Academic Qualifications: The percentage of lecturers holding a Doctoral degree (S3) in the S1 Agribusiness program was 26.67% (4 out of 15 lecturers).

  • Curriculum: Approximately 79% of courses (49 out of 62) in the S1 program had completed Semester Learning Plan (RPS) documents.

  • Remuneration Performance: The average remuneration points for Agribusiness lecturers reached 40.44, which is well above the university’s minimum standard of 28 points.

  • Student Enrollment: There was a slight decrease in new student enrollment (RPPM) by 1.50% for the S1 level, though this remains well within the safe limit (maximum 20% decline).

    Human Resources & Faculty Strengths:

    • Homebase Lecturers: Both programs met the minimum criteria, with 16 lecturers for S1 and 5 lecturers for S2.

    • Academic Rank: 87.50% of S1 lecturers held the rank of Assistant Professor (Lektor/Asisten Ahli), exceeding the 80% target. The S2 program featured 4 lecturers with senior ranks (Associate Professor or Professor).

    • Doctoral Ratio: The ratio of lecturers with S3 degrees in the S1 program stood at 25%, which is currently below the faculty target of 40%.

  • Lecturer-Student Ratio: The ratios remained ideal at 1:26.75 for S1 (max limit 1:40) and 1:3.8 for S2 (max limit 1:20).


  • Efficiency and Graduation:

    • Graduation Trends: There was a minor 2.81% decrease in the number of graduates over the last 5 years.

    • On-Time Graduation: The percentage of S1 students graduating within 4 years was 24.21%, which is below the 30% minimum target.

    • S2 Output: The Master’s program produced 22 graduates over the last 5 years, successfully meeting the minimum threshold of 10 graduates.